THE AMENDMENTS OF THE NEW ROMANIAN CIVIL CODE IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL LAW - THE GENERAL PART. THE NATURAL AND THE LEGAL PERSONS. THE RIGHTS IN REM AND IN THE AREA OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through this paper the author intends to analyze the amendments of the new regulation in the field of the Civil law – the general part, the natural and the legal persons and the rights in rem and in the area of the private international law. The new Civil Code, adopted by Law no. 287/2009, amended by Law no. 71/2011 for the application of the new Civil Code and by the Emergency Government Ordinance no. 79/2011 for regulating some necessary measures for the coming into effect of Law no. 287/2009 regarding the Civil Code, has entered into force on 01.10.2011. This Code has reformed profoundly the Romanian legal system, being a modern instrument for regulating the fundamental aspects of the individual and social existence, by using the experience of the reforms made by othe states (Italy, France, Canada – Quebec province, the Netherlands, Spain), and also the dispositions of European and international instruments. Passing over his imperfections, the new Civil Code is welcomed in the contemporary legislative scenery, reuniting, in an up-to-date language, regulations pertaing to the fields of the private law – Civil law (general part, the natural and the legal entities, the rights in rem, the obligations, the contracts, the successions), Family law, Commercial law, Private international law. Its implementation will answer the questions of the speciality literature authors regarding the application of certain disputed or unclear provisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".