Abstract 9284: Selective Complex Fractionated Electrogram Targeting For Atrial Fibrillation Study (Select AF): A Multicenter, Randomized Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: This study compared pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus generalized CFAE ablation vs PVI plus selective CFAE ablation, specifically areas of continuous electrical activity (CEA)(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00926783 ). Methods: Patients with persistent/high burden AF (age 63±9 yr, LA size 42±6 mm) were enrolled at 6 centers (n=86) & randomized. For the generalized arm, all CFAE regions with an interval confidence level >7 were ablated followed by PVI. For the selective arm, only those CFAE sites with CEA were ablated followed by PVI. For PVI, all PV antra were isolated with confirmed entrance block. Patients were followed with ECG, & 48-hr Holter every 3 mos. AF symptoms were confirmed by loop recording. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF >30 sec at 1 year. Results: Both generalized & selective CFAE ablation prolonged AF cycle length (26±32 ms vs 22±33 ms, p=0.6). AF termination rates were also similar: 37% for generalized & 31% for selective (p=0.6). In both groups, PVI was achieved after CFAE ablation in all patients. RF duration was significantly less in the selective arm vs the generalized arm (25±21 vs. 40±21 min, p=0.008). However, at 1 year follow-up, freedom from AF/AT recurrence was significantly higher in the generalized vs the selective arm after 1 procedure (59% vs 24%, p=0.005). Looking at AF/AT recurrence post 1st or repeat ablation, freedom from recurrence at one year in the generalized arm was 62%, still higher than 33% in the selective arm (p=0.02). There was a trend towards fewer repeat procedures in the generalized vs selective arm (14% vs 33%, p=0.057). Complications included tamponade (n=1) and a sedation-related event (n=1). Conclusions: In persistent/high burden AF, selective CFAE ablation + PVI results in similar AF cycle length prolongation and termination rates with significantly less RF time. However, long-term freedom from AF/AT is significantly better using generalized CFAE ablation + PVI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".