MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Bortezomib is active in Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM)—Results of a National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) phase II study in previously untreated or treated WM

2006· article· en· W2263077335 on OpenAlexaffabout
C. I. Chen, Tom Kouroukis, Darrell White, Michael Voralia, E. Stadtmauer, James R. Wright, Jean Powers, E. Eisenhauer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreJuravinski Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBortezomibInternal medicineWaldenstrom macroglobulinemiaMacroglobulinemiaGastroenterologyNeutropeniaMultiple myelomaRituximabNauseaProgressive diseaseMarginal zone B-cell lymphomaSurgeryLymphomaChemotherapyImmunologyB cellAntibodyMarginal zone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7543 Background: WM is a B cell lymphoma characterized by a serum monoclonal IgM and marrow infiltration by lymphoplasmacytoid cells. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor active in myeloma and other hematologic malignancies. In this 2-stage study, 27 WM pts received single agent bortezomib with RR as primary endpoint. Methods: Eligibility: symptomatic WM (Hb <110 g/L; lymphadenopathy; organomegaly; or hyperviscosity); ≤2 prior chemo regimens (± rituximab). Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV given d1, 4, 8, 11 on a 21d cycle until PD or 2 cycles beyond CR/SD. Nodal disease was included in response criteria (2nd International WM Workshop). Results: Median age 65 (46–87), M:F 14:13, no prior therapy 11 (44%). At entry, median IgM 38 g/L (11.2–83.3); median Hb 108 g/L (63–142); 18 (66%) with nodal disease on CT. At a median of 6 cycles (2–35), 11/27 (41%) patients had ≥50% decrease in IgM alone plus 10 (37%) minor responses (25–49% decrease). Using IgM + nodal criteria: 1 CR, 5 PR (≥50% decrease in IgM and bidimensional disease), 20 SD, 1 PD = overall RR 22% (95% CI 8.6–42.2%). IgM responses were prompt (median 2 cycles; range 1–8) with nodal responses lagging (median 4 cycles). Hb increased by ≥10g/L in 18 pts (66%). Bortezomib was well-tolerated with most non-hematologic toxicities Gr 1–2: fatigue (74%), nausea (63%), myalgias (51%), non-neutropenic infections (48%), diarrhea (44%), constipation (44%). 18 pts (66%) developed neuropathy (sensory): typical onset 2–4 cycles; Gr 3 in 5 pts; 15/18 (83%) improving ≥1 grade (11 complete) in 2–13 mo. Gr 3 myalgias in 2 pts resolved in <1 mo. Gr 3–4 thrombocytopenia (30%) and neutropenia (18%) led to 12 missed doses, 1 dose reduction. Conclusions: Bortezomib is active in WM with 78% pts with ≥25% fall in IgM, 41% with IgM response criteria of ≥50% decrease, 22% with composite nodal/IgM responses. Despite prompt IgM and hematologic improvement, decrease in nodal disease is slow, reflected in overall responses lower than IgM alone. Although bortezomib is generally well-tolerated, neuropathy is common but reversible. Bortezomib combinations with conventional cytotoxic or targeted agents warrant further study in WM. This is a NCIC CTG study with a grant from NCIC and funds from Canadian Cancer Society. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→