MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Environmentalism as Social Control? An Exploration of the Transformation of Pastoral Nomadic Societies in French Colonial North Africa

2000· article· en· W2263103314 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Diana Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPastoralismColonialismColonial rulePoliticsPopulationEthnologyAgricultureGeographyLegislationPopulation growthPolitical scienceEconomyDevelopment economicsSocioeconomicsLivestockHistorySociologyArchaeologyDemographyEconomicsForestryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When the French launched their 130 year rule in Algeria, this country was called the “land of sheep” (pays du mouton). This was appropriate, as nearly all of the local population was pastoralist or agro-pastoralist. This mobile population proved difficult to pacify and control and thus the French fought them, first in Algeria and later in Tunisia and Morocco, for a period spanning more than 100 years. Using many of the techniques developed at that time, contemporary North African regimes continue to execute the French colonial goal of controlling and sedentarizing the nomadic pastoralists. Many aspects of the pacification of North African populations by the French have been well-documented, especially in the military, political, and economic sectors. What has been less well explored, however, is how legislation in the agricultural and environmental sectors played a complementary role in the pacification and control of nomads in the Maghreb. This article, based on archival research, demonstrates how the im...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.015
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicRangeland Management and Livestock EcologyFrench-language works237,207