Opposing roles of K<sup>+</sup>and Cl<sup>−</sup>channels in maintenance of opossum lower esophageal sphincter tone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ionic basis underlying the maintenance of myogenic tone of lower esophageal sphincter circular muscle (LES) was investigated in opossum with the use of standard isometric tension and conventional intracellular microelectrode recordings in vitro. In tension recording studies, nifedipine (1 microM) reduced basal tone to 27.7 +/- 3.8% of control. The K(+) channel blockers tetraethylammonium (TEA, 2 mM), charybdotoxin (100 nM), and 4-aminopyridine (4-AP, 2 mM) enhanced resting tone, whereas apamin and glibenclamide were without affect. Cl(-) channel blockers DIDS (500 microM) and 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)-benzoic acid (500 microM), as well as niflumic acid (0.1-300 microM), decreased basal tone, but tamoxifen was without effect. Intracellular microelectrode recordings revealed ongoing, spontaneous, spike-like action potentials (APs). Nifedipine abolished APs and depolarized resting membrane potential (RMP). Both TEA and 4-AP significantly depolarized RMP and augmented APs, whereas niflumic acid dose-dependently hyperpolarized RMP and abolished APs. These data suggest that, in the opossum, basal tone is associated with continuous APs and that K(+) and Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-) channels have important opposing roles in the genesis of LES tone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".