MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263496669

경기도 전통민가의 퇴에 관한 연구

2004· article· ko· W2263496669 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
정연상, 이상해

Bibliographic record

Venue대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 · 2004
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Front (military)Quarter (Canadian coin)Type (biology)GeometryMathematicsGeographyGeologyEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringArchaeologyPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to verify the type and role of Toi(addition bays) found in the traditional dwellings, built before the year of 1945 in Kyong-gi province. Through the study, it is maintained that the space of inner quarters (an-chae), outer quarters (bakat-chae) and the elements of exterior space are very important to determine the type and role of the Toi. The Toi of inner quarters is the general type which is composed of horizontal row of Toigan in front of the Daechung(ma-ru) and vertical row of the Toigan in front of the kitchen, opens towards the courtyard(an-ma-dang). The Toi of outer quarters is the general type which is in front of the room(sarang-bang) and main gate(dae-moon). The floor of the Toi is wooden(ma-ru) or earthen(bong-dang). The Toi that connects up the space of inner and outer quarter plays diverse roles: private space, approach space, storage space, community space, connective space, open space and so on.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계Same topicCultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207