Pulmonary Ossification Syndrome in a Patient with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
First described more than 150 years ago, diffuse pulmonary ossification is a rare disease that can be idiopathic or secondary to an underlying chronic disorder. Commonly under-recognized and challenging to diagnose, clinical, radiographic and functional tests are often necessary. Given the increasing prevalence of chronic lung disease in the aging population, it is likely the pulmonary ossification will be encountered in clinics more often. This article describes the diagnosis of the condition in a 51-year-old man. Pulmonary ossification syndrome is a rare disease characterized by bone tissue formation in the lung parenchyma with or without bone marrow elements. This disorder, often under-recognized, can be idiopathic or secondary to an underlying chronic disorder such as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The pathogenesis involves tissue injury and an alkaline environment in which the precipitation of calcium salts enables alkaline phosphatase activity. This activates profibrogenic cytokines that convert fibroblasts into osteoblasts. Diagnosis can prove challenging and is based on clinical, radiographic and functional tests, and by tissue biopsy. Achieving an accurate and timely diagnosis is essential to avoid erroneous treatments due to misdiagnosis and to expand knowledge of its progression, prognosis and treatment. As the population and prevalence of chronic lung disease increases, it is likely that physicians will encounter more cases of pulmonary ossification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".