MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2263757878 · doi:10.14288/1.0095695

The role of sound in the British Columbia troll salmon fishery

2010· article· en· W2263757878 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Ross Boyes

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFisherySound (geography)Fish <Actinopterygii>BiologyOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparked by anecdotal accounts of boat noise influencing the catch rates of commercial salmon trollers on the B.C. coast, acoustical studies of both boats and fish were undertaken. The study was in four parts: 1. Acoustical output of salmon trollers: Recordings were made of troll vessels and examined on a spectrum analyzer. Sonic output was predominantly of low frequency, under 300 Hz. Output levels at trolling speed (1-2 m/s) were about 20 dB re 1 μbar at 1 meter from the hull. Higher frequency spikes (1-2.5 kHz) were observed with operation of hydraulic pumps for auxiliary equipment. Broadband, transient output (approximately 1-6 kHz), was thought to be correlated with cavitation from propellors. 2. Fish sounds: Recordings were made of herring, salmon and rainbow trout swimming rapidly and feeding on pellets in net pen enclosures. These were examined on a spectrum analyzer. Two types of sounds were evident, "knocks" and "scratches". Knocks were correlated with rapid swimming and maneuvering and are likely of hydrodynamic origin. Scratches were thought to be produced by branchiate and skeletal movements and were relatively faint. Knocks were l-2 kHz, scratches 3.5-5.5 kHz. The dominant sounds in actively feeding, subsurface salmonids, were knocks. Recordings of feeding schools sounded remarkably like trickling water to the human ear. 3. Attracting salmon in net pens: Attempts were made to lure coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and chinook (Oncorhynchus tschawy tscha) as well as rainbov/ trout (Salmo gairdneri) to a speaker projecting recorded feeding sounds of the target fish. No responses of any kind were observed to output levels as high as 55 dB re 1 μbar at 1 meter. 4. Attracting salmon at sea: Recorded and simulated feeding and swimming sounds of salmonids were projected within the gear array of a commercial salmon troller fishing on the west coast of Vancouver Island, B.C. Catch rates were monitored with the test sounds on and off. Output level was 55 dB re 1 μbar at 1 meter. No significant change in catch rate was observed in response to the test sounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→