How Religion Becomes Political. A Comparative Study of Religion and Morality Policy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies of morality policy have long noticed the significance of religious values in conflicts over morality issues. What Americans typically know as the ‘culture wars’ on issues like abortion and same-sex marriage are really conflicts over the relative weight given to religious or secular values in politics and public life. Similarly, religious actors like the Roman Catholic Church are known to take rigorously conservative stands on morality issues and publicly criticize any political development toward liberalization. Given the importance of religion, however, scholars may easily misinterpret the direct impact of religion on morality policies.This paper argues that while religious values are often involved in morality policy conflicts, the interaction between the two domains is far from simple. It is not as if the relative religiosity or secularization of a given country serves as a barometer of the policies they eventually adopt. On the contrary, most modern political systems and actors have developed historically to achieve independence from religious institutions and creeds, which is why permissive morality policies can coexist with relatively religious societies and even the most secular societies may hold on to conservative policies even without the religious backing.The paper proposes an understanding where the politicization of morality issues is largely dependent on the ability of the political parties in a given country to conflict over the role of religious and secular values in public life. Whether or not this is the case is determined by factors internal to the political system rather than the level of religion in society. Some party systems easily serve up opportunities for actors to politicize morality issues and perhaps also the role of religious values in society. In other countries, however, the party structure either excludes morality conflicts or reframes the issues into recognizable conflicts between left and right, economic redistribution, etc. The empirical analysis compares the politicization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) and same-sex marriage across four countries, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Switzerland and the Netherlands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".