MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2264190290

Pharmacokinetics of ARRY-543 from a Phase 1 study in cancer patients

2007· article· en· W2264190290 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Litwiler, Karen A. Gelmon, Christian Kollmannsberger, Sharon Karan, Kathleen A. Kane, Lara Maloney, Gary Gordon, M.L. Rothenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacokineticsDosingMedicinePharmacologyAnimal scienceChemistryInternal medicineBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C164 Background: ARRY-543 is an ATP-competitive, selective, reversible inhibitor of EGFR and ErbB2 that is being developed for the treatment of cancer. The safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ARRY-543 have been assessed in patients as part of a Phase I open-label study with escalating QD and BID dosing.
 Methods: ARRY-543 was administered to successive cohorts of patients with solid tumors. All patients received a single oral dose followed by a one week observation period. Daily dosing (QD or BID) started on Day 8 with the cycle ending on Day 36. Blood samples were collected on Day 1 of dosing (single dose) and on Day 22 (at steady-state). Plasma concentrations of ARRY-543 were quantitated using a validated LC-MS/MS method with a quantitation range of 5 ng/mL to 40 µg/mL (Keystone Analytical, North Wales, PA). The mean inter-batch values for precision and accuracy of analysis were 5.9% and 1.7%, respectively.
 Results: As of July 2007, single dose (n=40) and steady-state (n=33) PK has been assessed at dose levels of 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg. Following single doses of ARRY-543, there was a dose-proportional increase in mean C max and AUC inf values over the dose range studied. Following a 400 mg dose, the mean (± SD) C max value was 2.01 ± 1.04 µg/mL, and the mean AUC inf value was 21.6 ± 17.0 µg-hr/mL. The mean T max value tended to increase somewhat from 1.5 to 3.6 hours post-dose with increasing doses, whereas the mean t 1/2 value was similar for all dose levels (6.6 ± 1.5 hours). Following QD dosing, exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner with a maximum mean AUC 24hr value of 34.2 µg-hr/mL for the 400-mg QD cohort (n=3). The mean accumulation ratio for all QD cohorts was 1.46 ± 0.23. Following BID dosing, exposure increased in a linear, but somewhat greater than dose-proportional, manner. The mean daily steady-state plasma AUC increased from 13.5 to 40.9 to 71.3 µg-hr/mL at doses of 100, 200 and 300 mg BID, respectively. Preliminary data at the 400 mg BID dose shows continued increases in AUC, with a value of 125 µg-hr/mL. At the 300 mg BID dose level, the mean C max and C trough values were 4.53 and 2.06 µg/mL, respectively, giving a mean peak-to-trough value of 2.2 and a mean accumulation ratio of 1.9. Dosing at 300 mg BID was well-tolerated even though the predicted mean plasma concentrations of ARRY-543 were maintained continually at > 2 µg/mL for 28 days. Preliminary evidence of activity was stable disease, with eight of fifteen patients in the 100-300 mg BID cohorts remaining on therapy for 12 - 32+ weeks.
 Conclusions: ARRY-543 has shown excellent pharmacokinetic properties in the Phase 1 study. The systemic exposure of ARRY-543 increased dose-proportionally over the range of 50 to 400 mg with no indication of reaching the maximum absorbable dose. The t 1/2 value remained constant with increasing dose. At steady-state, following continuous BID dosing at 300 mg, the drug was well tolerated, and plasma concentrations were maintained at > 2 µg/mL with a small peak-to-trough ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207