Abstract 406: Improved Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Expression and Function in Transglutaminase 2 Knock-Out Mice Treated with Angiotensin II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Transglutaminase 2 (TG2) induces transamidation and cross-linking of proteins that can modulate receptor interaction. Angiotensin II (AngII) may regulate TG2 and AngII type 2 receptor (AT2) expression and function. We hypothesized that AngII may impair AT2 expression and function through TG2. Methods: TG2-knockout mice (TG2-K/O, 8 weeks old, 6 for each group) and age-matched wild type (WT) mice were treated or not with AngII (400 ng/kg/min) for 14 days. Vascular reactivity was assessed in response to sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 10 nM to 1 mM), in mesenteric arteries pre-contracted with norepinephrine (10 μM). AT2 function was assessed by concentration-response curve to the selective AT2 agonist Compound 21 (C21, 1nM to 1 μM) in mesenteric arteries pre-contracted with norepinephrine. AT2 expression in aorta was evaluated by immunoblotting. Results: C21-induced relaxation was similar in untreated WT, and in untreated TG2-K/O. C21-induced relaxation was improved only in AngII-treated TG2-K/O (2-fold increase vs untreated TG2-K/O, P<0.001). SNP dependent relaxation was similar in all groups. AT2 receptor expression was similar in untreated WT and untreated TG2-K/O. AT2 was reduced by AngII in WT (-36±6% vs untreated WT, P<0.01), and significantly increased in TG2-K/O (+53±4% vs untreated TG2-K/O, P<0.001). Conclusions: AngII fails to reduce AT2 expression and function in TG2-K/O mice. Therefore, AngII may negatively modulate AT2 receptor expression and function through TG2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".