MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2264381705 · doi:10.4158/ep151059.cr

Management Of Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Does Aggressive Fluid Resuscitation Actually Result In Cerebral Edema? The Case Of A 6-Year-Old With Aggressive Fluid Resuscitation

2016· article· en· W2264381705 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen Addai, Jason Trachovic

Bibliographic record

VenueAACE Clinical Case Reports · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsCypress Health RegionUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineResuscitationDiabetic ketoacidosisPediatric intensive care unitCerebral edemaIntensive care medicineAnesthesiaShock (circulatory)Intensive care unitSalineDiabetes mellitusInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The role of fluid resuscitation in the causation of cerebral edema has been controversial and the subject of several studies over the decades. The aim of this case report is to challenge the perception that aggressive fluid resuscitation in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) causes cerebral edema.Methods: We describe the case of a 6-year-old with DKA who made an excellent recovery with no immediate or long-term sequelae, despite being given large amounts of appropriate fluids for resuscitation. Additional literature review was conducted to explore the link between DKA and fluid resuscitation.Results: Many Canadian and international experts recommend initial fluid resuscitation with intravenous normal saline at 10 to 20 mL/kg within the first 1 to 2 hours to a maximum of 30 mL/kg only if shock is suspected. Our patient required in excess of 30 mL/kg as recommended and was transferred to a regional pediatric intensive care unit, where the aggressive volume expansion was continued, and made an excellent recovery.Conclusion: The apprehension towards a more liberal resuscitation is due to the feared theoretical risk, which has not been borne by the available evidence. Despite this absence of evidence, several international recommendations have remained conservative in their approach. A more aggressive approach in certain situations may be appropriate as recommended by the new International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines.Abbreviations: CT = computed tomography; DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis; IV = intravenous; NS = normal saline; PICU = pediatric intensive care unit

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAACE Clinical Case ReportsSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207