MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Microsatellite instability and loss of PTEN expression in early versus late-stage endometrial cancer: Results from studies of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG)

2009· article· en· W2264841567 on OpenAlexaffabout
Helen Mackay, Steve Gallinger, Miriam Tsao, C. Meg McLachlin, Katharina Kieser, E. Eisenhauer, D. Tu, Amit M. Oza

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPTENMedicineMicrosatellite instabilityEndometrial cancerInternal medicineUnivariate analysisOncologyCancerStage (stratigraphy)Breast cancerMultivariate analysisBiologyGeneMicrosatellitePI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5534 Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI+) and inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN are implicated in the development of endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic value of MSI and PTEN in 2 patient (pt) populations, early stage vs. advanced/recurrent disease. Methods: Archival paraffin embedded tumor from pts with EC enrolled in closed NCIC-CTG studies: stage I/II (EN5) and advanced/recurrent disease(IND 126, 148 and 160) were examined for MSI (BAT 25/26) and for PTEN expression (immunohistochemistry). PTEN and MSI status were correlated with clinicopathologic features and outcome from NCIC-CTG trial databases. Results: 188 pt samples (97 stage I/II;91 advanced/recurrent disease) were examined. Results are available for PTEN in 129 pts and MSI in 166 pts. Overall, 55% were PTEN negative (-) and 19.3% MSI+. 33 (56.9%) pts were PTEN - in EN5 vs. 38 pts (53.5%) IND studies (p = 0.73). Overall, no association was seen between PTEN or MSI status and age, performance status (PS), tumor grade or histology. In univariate analysis, there was a trend towards improved survival (S) in pts with PTEN - EC (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36 -1.04, p = 0.07), weaker in multivariate analysis (HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.26–1.18 p = 0.12). In EN5, PTEN status was not associated with S in uni-or multivariate analyses. In the IND studies there was a trend towards improved S in univariate analysis (HR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32–1.06 p = 0.07). More pts were MSI+ in EN5, 23 (27.4%) vs. IND studies, 9 (11%) p = 0.01. In EN5, microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors were associated with a better prognosis in both univariate (HR = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06–0.51, p < 0.0001) and multivariate analysis (HR = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.5, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in S between pts with MSS vs. MSI+ tumors overall, or in the IND studies. in uni- or multivariate analyses. There was no correlation between MSI and PTEN status overall or in either group of pts. Conclusions: MSI+ tumors are more common, and are associated with a worse prognosis, in early stage EC. There is a trend towards improved S for pts with PTEN- advanced EC. There is no association between PTEN and MSI status. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.275
GPT teacher head0.517
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerFrench-language works237,207