Participation of young people with a functional disability in physical and sports activities. Visions and concerns of school staff in Quebec.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les jeunes ayant une limitation fonctionnelle (ALF) font face a des defis plus importants en ce qui a trait a la pratique d’activites physiques et sportives et a l’adoption de saines habitudes de vie, comparativement aux jeunes presentant un developpement typique. Par le biais d’une approche qualitative fondee sur la conduite de 56 entretiens, cette etude vise a mieux comprendre les strategies mises en place par les personnes intervenant aupres de ces jeunes ALF en milieu scolaire pour les faire participer a des activites physiques et sportives et, de fait, mettre en lumiere les besoins, les attentes et les preoccupations de ces encadrants sur cette problematique integrative et educative liee au sport. Les resultats demontrent que les activites de sports inclusifs ont un impact substantiel sur ces jeunes, leur entourage et leur milieu de vie. Parallelement, la faiblesse de l’offre sportive pour ce public dans des cadres scolaires et parascolaires illustre bien la pertinence et l’importance de soutenir le developpement d’outils pedagogiques, de formation et une necessaire liaison a l’amenagement des espaces de pratique notamment pour inciter la mise en œuvre d’approches inclusives en activites physiques et sportives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".