MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2265110133

Les gisements en mer des hydrocarbures transfrontalières: régime juridique en droit de la délimitation maritime (Transboundary Submarine Oil and Gas Deposits: Legal Order in the Law of Maritime Boundaries)

2016· article· fr· W2265110133 on OpenAlexaff
Yacouba Cissé

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaritime boundaryJurisdictionPolitical scienceHumanitiesUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the SeaArbitrationInternational lawGeographyLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

French Abstract: L’extension des limites offshore sous juridiction des Etats cotiers est un acte de souverainete continue sur les espaces maritimes contigus aux territoires terrestres. Mais cet elargissement fonctionnel des zones marines et sous-marines s’accompagne generalement par des revendications concurrentes sur les ressources et explique, dans une large mesure, les nombreux contentieux de delimitation maritime entre etats cotiers. L’exploration et l’exploitation des gisements transfrontaliers de petrole ou de gaz s’inscrivent dans ce cadre conflictuel. En tant que ressources partagees et necessitant une cooperation entre Etats concernes, ces gisements posent des problemes quant a leur regime juridique et plus particulierement a leur delimitation. La presente etude tentera d’analyser ces problemes. Elle fera l’etat des solutions possibles au regard de la Convention sur le droit de la mer, de la pratique des Etats en general et plus singulierement de la pratique africaine. La jurisprudence de la Cour internationale de justice et des tribunaux d’arbitrage sera examinee. English Abstract: The extension of offshore limits under coastal states' jurisdiction is a matter of constant debate as to state sovereignty over the contiguous zone of maritime spaces. However this functional widening of marine and submarine areas usually entails concurrent claims on enclosed resources, and this largely explains the number of litigation cases on maritime boundary delimitation opposing coastal states. The exploration and exploitation of transboundary oil and gas deposits are sources of constant conflicts. Since these deposits are shared resources that require the cooperation of all states involved, points at issue are the determination of the legal order and especially of maritime boundaries. The present study focuses on these problems. It sets out possible solutions in light of the Convention on the Law of the Sea, state practice generally and more particularly African practice. The caselaw of the International Court of Justice and arbitral tribunals is examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207