Identification of fungi and bacteria associated with internally discolored horseradish roots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to identify fungi and bacteria associated with the internally discolored horseradish roots. During 2008-2009, 75, 306, 115, and 120, horseradish roots from California, Illinois, Ontario (Canada), and Wisconsin, respectively, were collected and tested for the presence of fungi and bacteria. The roots were surface-disinfected and five segments (5 mm thick) were cut from each root and placed onto acidified potato dextrose agar (A-PDA) and nutrient agar (NA) in Petri plates. The plates were incubated at 22-24 ???C with 12 h light/12 h darkness. \n \n Small plaques from the edges of the growing fungal colonies were transferred onto PDA. Morphological characteristics of fungal isolates were examined and compared with the references. Molecular identification of the fungal isolates was accomplished by sequence analysis of the PCR products, resulting from using fungal universal primers (ITS5 and ITS4 for all fungal isolates), mitochondrial DNA primers cox3A-cox3B and nad1A-nad1B for Verticillium isolates, and elongation factor 1 alpha primer EF-1H-EF-2T and mitochondrial small subunit rDNA primers NMS1-NMS2 for Fusarium isolates. A total of 18 fungal genera were identified, which included Alternaria (3.8% roots), Arthopyreniaceae (0.4%), Chaetomium (0.6%), Colletotrichum (2.3%), Cordyceps (2.3%), Cylindrocarpon (0.9%), Fusarium (31.8%), Neonectria (1.3%), Penicillium (4.4%), Phoma (0.1%), Phomopsis (0.4%), Pyrenochaeta (2.7%), Rhizoctonia (0.1%), Rhizopus (1.0%), Rhizopycnis (0.4), Trichurus (0.6%), Ulocladium (0.4%), and Verticillium (38.0%). In greenhouse tests Verticillium dahliae, V. longisporum, Fusarium acuminatum, F. commune, F. oxysporum, and F. solani caused internal root discoloration, and F. commune caused root rot in horseradish plants. \n \nSingle-cell colonies of isolated bacteria were grown on NA. Characteristics of each purified colony were recorded. Isolated bacteria were identified based on the analysis of sequences of 16S rDNA, resulting from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) - restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay. A total of 52 bacterial species in 20 genera were identified, which were classified into five classes, Actinobacteria (50 roots), Alphaproteobacteria (10 roots), Bacilli (234 roots), Betaproteobacteria (4 roots), and Gammaproteobacteria (287 roots). The majority of the isolates were identified as Bacillus and Pseudomonas, which were isolated from 185 and 204 roots, respectively. Results of in vitro tests showed that three Bacillus isolates and two Pseudomonas isolates strongly inhibited the growth of Verticillium and Fusarium species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".