MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2265475395 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-02/47/1859

Chemical Deposition of Vanadium Oxide Electrode for Electrochemical Capacitors

2015· article· en· W2265475395 on OpenAlexaff
Haoran Wu, Keryn Lian

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceVanadiumScanning electron microscopeTitaniumChemical engineeringVanadium oxideCyclic voltammetryElectrochemistryOxideSubstrate (aquarium)ElectrodeLayer (electronics)Titanium oxideInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyMetallurgyComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Vanadium oxides have been investigated as pseudocapacitive electrode material because of their low cost, abundance in nature and high energy capacity [1-2]. The performance of the electrodes strongly depends on the fabrication methods. However, a technique that can produce vanadium oxide with high performance, low cost and ready to scale up is yet to be developed. In this work, we demonstrate a novel and simple chemical method to deposit vanadium oxides with potential applications in electrochemical capacitors. EXPERIMENTAL A thin Titanium foil was ultrasonically cleaned by acetone and immersed in a 20ml 0.5M VOSO4solution. 0.3ml 1M NaOH was added to initiate a chemical precipitation process. The titanium substrate was left un-stirred in the solution for 5 days until the surface was covered by a greenish film. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken to examine the surface morphology. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was used to characterize the electrochemical performance of the samples in 1 M LiCl solution. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The SEM image of the surface, illustrated in Fig. 1, showed the chemical deposited vanadium oxide had layered structure with a denser layer at the bottom and a sparser and island-like layer on the top. Yet two layers are highly porous with meso- and macro- porosity, suggesting the chemical deposition enabled a large surface area that might contribute to a high capacitance. It was found the entire surface was covered by the porous vanadium oxide, showing the chemical deposition is evenly distributed on the substrate. The cycle life of vanadium oxide electrode was shown in Fig.2, where the CV of the 1st cycle, 1000th cycle, 2000th cycle and 3000th cycle were compared. The result depicted a very rectangular and ideal capacitive behavior, suggesting the deposited vanadium oxide is suitable in electrochemical capacitors application. As a comparison, the CV of the Ti substrate showed very little capacitance. Moreover, it showed little change in CV profile from 1st to 3000thcycle, indicating that the electrode was stable for long time cycling in 1 M LiCl. There was a slight decrease in capacitance after 3000 cycle (ca. 10%), likely due to the some degradation on the surface. However, since vanadium oxide was usually reported to have poor stability due to pulverization and dissolution [1], the results in Fig. 2 is still very promising. In addition to the morphology and electrochemical characterizations, the composition and crystal structures of the produced vanadium oxide were also investigated. These results will be presented as well. REFERENCES [1] G. Wang, X. Lu, Y. Ling, T. Zhai, H. Wang, Y. Tong, Y. Li, ACS Nano, 6, 10296 (2012) [2] I.-H. Kim, J.-H. Kim, B.-W. Cho, K.-B. Kim, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 153, A1451 (2006) Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication→French-language works237,207→