Chemical Deposition of Vanadium Oxide Electrode for Electrochemical Capacitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vanadium oxides have been investigated as pseudocapacitive electrode material because of their low cost, abundance in nature and high energy capacity [1-2]. The performance of the electrodes strongly depends on the fabrication methods. However, a technique that can produce vanadium oxide with high performance, low cost and ready to scale up is yet to be developed. In this work, we demonstrate a novel and simple chemical method to deposit vanadium oxides with potential applications in electrochemical capacitors. EXPERIMENTAL A thin Titanium foil was ultrasonically cleaned by acetone and immersed in a 20ml 0.5M VOSO4solution. 0.3ml 1M NaOH was added to initiate a chemical precipitation process. The titanium substrate was left un-stirred in the solution for 5 days until the surface was covered by a greenish film. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken to examine the surface morphology. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was used to characterize the electrochemical performance of the samples in 1 M LiCl solution. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The SEM image of the surface, illustrated in Fig. 1, showed the chemical deposited vanadium oxide had layered structure with a denser layer at the bottom and a sparser and island-like layer on the top. Yet two layers are highly porous with meso- and macro- porosity, suggesting the chemical deposition enabled a large surface area that might contribute to a high capacitance. It was found the entire surface was covered by the porous vanadium oxide, showing the chemical deposition is evenly distributed on the substrate. The cycle life of vanadium oxide electrode was shown in Fig.2, where the CV of the 1st cycle, 1000th cycle, 2000th cycle and 3000th cycle were compared. The result depicted a very rectangular and ideal capacitive behavior, suggesting the deposited vanadium oxide is suitable in electrochemical capacitors application. As a comparison, the CV of the Ti substrate showed very little capacitance. Moreover, it showed little change in CV profile from 1st to 3000thcycle, indicating that the electrode was stable for long time cycling in 1 M LiCl. There was a slight decrease in capacitance after 3000 cycle (ca. 10%), likely due to the some degradation on the surface. However, since vanadium oxide was usually reported to have poor stability due to pulverization and dissolution [1], the results in Fig. 2 is still very promising. In addition to the morphology and electrochemical characterizations, the composition and crystal structures of the produced vanadium oxide were also investigated. These results will be presented as well. REFERENCES [1] G. Wang, X. Lu, Y. Ling, T. Zhai, H. Wang, Y. Tong, Y. Li, ACS Nano, 6, 10296 (2012) [2] I.-H. Kim, J.-H. Kim, B.-W. Cho, K.-B. Kim, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 153, A1451 (2006) Figure 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".