Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives : The aim of this study is to make proof of availability for the abdominal diagnosis. This study was designed to compare with the effect of the herb- medication based on abdominal diagnosis and Dangkisoo-san(Dangguixu-san) herb-medication by McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form(SF-MPQ) and Pain Disability Index(PDI) in traffic accident patients. Methods : The group for Herb-medication based on abdominal diagnosis consists of 20 patients and the group for Dangkisoo-san(Dangguixu-san) herb-medication consists of 20 patients. The degree of improvement was evaluated By SF-MPQ and PDI after one week treatment. Results : After 1 week treatment there was no significant difference between the two groups in SF-MPQ, PDI scores. Conclusions : The group treated with herb-medication based on abdominal diagnosis is not statistically different from that of Dangkisoo-san(Dangguixu-san) herb-medication group on traffic accident patients. Further study is needed about the effectiveness of the abdominal diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".