Parametric Study for Lossless Casing Treatment on a Mixed-Flow Compressor Rotor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A systematic numerical study has been carried out to investigate the effects of casing treatment slots geometry and location on the stall margin and peak efficiency of an isolated mixed-flow rotor at high subsonic flow conditions. Based on the literature review for axial rotor, a semi-circular axial skewed slot casing treatment placed in the leading edge region was chosen as the starting configuration as it has the best potential of producing stall margin improvement with low peak efficiency loss. A computational parametric study was performed from this baseline casing treatment geometry to identify the most important geometrical design parameters and to arrive at a design with noticeable stall margin improvement and no loss in peak efficiency. The results show that the design parameters with the largest impact on stall margin improvement and peak efficiency are: open area ratio, slot skew angle, slot axial length and slot axial position. The slots depth and slot shape seem to have only limited influence on performance. While not yet optimized, a slot casing treatment design with significant stall margin improvement and no loss in peak efficiency was obtained. To the authors’ knowledge, this work is the most extensive slot casing treatments parametric study so far in term of number of design parameters considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it