Differential expression of E‐cadherin and catenins in ovarian sex cord stromal tumours
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Sex cord stromal tumours (SCSTs) of the ovary encompass several histological tumour subtypes that are defined by characteristic histological features. Some can show morphological overlap with other subtypes of SCSTs, as well as with non-SCSTs. The E-cadherin/catenin complex constitutes the adherens junction, which is well developed in epithelial tissue, but the constituent molecules are also expressed in several non-epithelial tumours. The aim of this study was to determine whether the expression patterns of E-cadherin and catenins in ovarian SCSTs can be of diagnostic utility. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the expression of E-cadherin, α-, β- and γ-catenin in 55 tumours using immunohistochemistry. We found that all tumour subtypes showed nuclear expression of E-cadherin, while only microcystic stromal tumours (MCSTs) displayed a distinct profile, with nuclear localization of all three catenins in almost all cases. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the E-cadherin expression profile in SCSTs can assist in distinguishing between SCSTs and non-SCSTs in which there is no nuclear expression of E-cadherin. The nuclear localization of catenins may be of potential use in distinguishing MCST from other subtypes of SCST.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".