MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2265871094

Abstract: Monazite U-Th-Pb dating by electron microprobe: a powerful new tool for constraining tectonothermal models

2007· article· en· W2265871094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert J. Tracy, C. W. Loehn, David P. Moecher

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMonaziteMetamorphismPaleontologyOrogenyGranuliteTerraneRecrystallization (geology)GeochemistryStructural basinTectonicsZirconFacies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

s – GAC Newfoundland Section, 2007 Spring Technical Meeting Atlantic Geology, 2007, Volume 43, Number 1 Copyright © 2015 Atlantic Geology atlantic geology . volume 43 . 2007 83 Copyright © Atlantic Geology, 2007 tion of structural and stratigraphic observations. We emphasize that these new dates are mainly of use in interpreting ambiguous field data and regional correlations. In central Massachusetts and adjacent areas (from the Bronson Hill arc eastward to the high-grade zones of the Sturbridge area), the conventional view has been of a principal Acadian tectonothermal event at ca. 400 Ma (Robinson’s “classic Acadian”) with a successor event at ca. 360 Ma (his “neo-Acadian”). Targeted monazite dating indicates highestgrade (near-granulite) metamorphism at ca. 435 Ma, with additional events at 400 Ma and 360 Ma. Abrupt age breaks across strike suggest major regional east-west shortening with cryptic major faults. To the west, approaching the Bronson Hill arc, a major belt of late recrystallization at 330 Ma indicates early onset of Alleghanian effects, and post-300 age resetting is seen as main-phase Alleghanian. In western Connecticut (west of the Mesozoic basin), the conventional model is of a Taconic fore-arc allochthonous on Laurentian margin (Grenville) with in situ post-Taconic sedimentary basins, all metamorphosed to kyanite-sillimanite grade in the Acadian, and with minor Alleghanian overprint to the south near Long Island Sound. Our dating shows a complex pattern of intermixed Taconic ages (ca. 520, 470–480 and 445–450 Ma) with multi-stage Acadian ages (> 420, 385–390 and 355–360 Ma), but some locations in older rocks within the supposed Acadian belt show no evidence of preceding Taconic metamorphism. Cameron’s Line, a notable tectonic break highlighted by Rodgers on his 1985 Connecticut geologic map, has been interpreted as the western limit of imbricated Taconic thrust slices containing deep-water rocks. Our dating shows that numerous locations in assumed Cambro–Ordovician rocks east of Cameron’s line did not experience Taconic metamorphism at all, and thus these rocks may have originated east of the Bronson Hill arc prior to the Acadian (broadly defined). This would basically require that Cameron’s line marks the western limit of a major detachment zone rather than the western limit of far-travelled Taconic thrusts. Abstracts – GAC Newfoundland Section, 2007 Spring Technical Meetings – GAC Newfoundland Section, 2007 Spring Technical Meeting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→