Three new cases of terminal deletion of the long arm of chromosome 7 and literature review to correlate genotype and phenotype manifestations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partial monosomy of the long arm of chromosome 7 has been characterized by wide phenotypic manifestations, but holoprosencephaly (HPE) and sacral agenesis have frequently been associated with this chromosomal deletion. A clear relationship between genotype and phenotype remains to be defined in the 7q deletion syndrome. Three patients (1, 2, and 3) were investigated with 7q terminal deletion and compared with similar deletion cases in the literature in order to stratify the phenotypes associated with 7q35 and 7q36 terminal deletion patients. Patients 1, 2, and 3 were carrying a de novo terminal deletion at bands 7q36.2, 7q35, and 7q36.1, respectively. In patient 3, a small Xq28 duplication was also identified by array-CGH. Our patients presented with heterogeneous phenotypic manifestations, which could imply the possible role of environmental factors (multifactorial inheritance), structural variations in the non-coding regions, penetrance, and/or polymorphism. The varying length of deletion was also taken into account. Growth retardation was the most frequent symptom found in both 7q35 and 7q36 patients we reviewed. The occurrence of HPE and sacral malformation together was seen in less than 10% of the reviewed cases in both kinds of deletion. HPE was associated mainly in cases with an unbalanced translocation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".