MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2266165427 · doi:10.30096/csmj.200612.0009

The Clinical Use of an Automatic External Defibrillator in a Dialysis Clinic: A Case Report.

2006· article· zh· W2266165427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wei-Tse Kao, Kou-Shuen Chen, Ying‐Hock Teng

Bibliographic record

Venue中山醫學雜誌 · 2006
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDefibrillationVentricular fibrillationSudden cardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationMedical emergencyDialysisIncidence (geometry)Return of spontaneous circulationSudden cardiac deathEmergency medicineResuscitationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is the leading cause of death in the United States and Canada and cardiovascular disease is the second cause of death in Taiwan in 2004. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is the most common rhythm found in adults with SCA, so early defibrillation is extremely crucial to the survival of SCA victims. Evidences support the establishment of public access defibrillation (PAD) programs in areas where the frequency of cardiac arrest events makes it probable that one automatic external defibrillator (AED) would be used in five years (annual incidence of SCA≧0.2). AEDs are placed in many airports, casinos and numerous other public locations in the United States and AEDs are also used by healthcare professionals in ambulances, hospitals and clinics. One study of the incidence of SCA in medical and dental clinics found that the incidence of SCA in dialysis clinics to be relatively high (≧0.746 per practice annually) and recommended that AEDs be placed in all dialysis clinics. In Taiwan, AEDs are usually thought of as emergency medical services (EMS) equipments, and PADs are not usually available in public places. Herein we present a case involving a 51.-year-old male who experienced SCA during hemodialysis in a dialysis clinic. Immediately cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed, but no defibrillation was done. Emergency medical technicians (EMTs) came into the clinic after 5 minutes and defibrillation was done via AED. The patient was later transferred to the emergency room of a nearby hospital, where return of spontaneous circulation was found. That patient then received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), at which time he was found to have triple vessel coronary artery disease. After 10 days hospitalization, patient was discharged without any obvious neurologic deficits. This case report can serve as a reminder that AEDs might be placed more conveniently throughout the island, particularly in dialysis clinics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue中山醫學雜誌→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→