MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266381963 · doi:10.1002/2015jg003061

Effects of permafrost aggradation on peat properties as determined from a pan‐Arctic synthesis of plant macrofossils

2015· article· en· W2266381963 on OpenAlex
Claire C. Treat, Miriam C. Jones, Philip Camill, Angela Gallego‐Sala, Michelle Garneau, J. W. Harden, Gustaf Hugelius, Eric S. Klein, Ulla Kokfelt, Peter Kuhry, Julie Loisel, Paul Mathijssen, Jonathan A. O’Donnell, Pirita Oksanen, Tiina Ronkainen, A. Britta K. Sannel, Julie Talbot, C. Tarnocai, Minna Väliranta

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersAcademy of FinlandNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UKRoyal Swedish Academy of SciencesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPermafrostTundraPeatBogMacrofossilBorealAggradationThermokarstTaigaGeologyVegetation (pathology)Subarctic climateSoil carbonEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographyHydrology (agriculture)ArcticEcologySoil scienceGeomorphologySoil waterOceanographyGeographyHolocene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Permafrost dynamics play an important role in high‐latitude peatland carbon balance and are key to understanding the future response of soil carbon stocks. Permafrost aggradation can control the magnitude of the carbon feedback in peatlands through effects on peat properties. We compiled peatland plant macrofossil records for the northern permafrost zone (515 cores from 280 sites) and classified samples by vegetation type and environmental class (fen, bog, tundra and boreal permafrost, and thawed permafrost). We examined differences in peat properties (bulk density, carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and organic matter content, and C/N ratio) and C accumulation rates among vegetation types and environmental classes. Consequences of permafrost aggradation differed between boreal and tundra biomes, including differences in vegetation composition, C/N ratios, and N content. The vegetation composition of tundra permafrost peatlands was similar to permafrost‐free fens, while boreal permafrost peatlands more closely resembled permafrost‐free bogs. Nitrogen content in boreal permafrost and thawed permafrost peatlands was significantly lower than in permafrost‐free bogs despite similar vegetation types (0.9% versus 1.5% N). Median long‐term C accumulation rates were higher in fens (23 g C m −2 yr −1 ) than in permafrost‐free bogs (18 g C m −2 yr −1 ) and were lowest in boreal permafrost peatlands (14 g C m −2 yr −1 ). The plant macrofossil record demonstrated transitions from fens to bogs to permafrost peatlands, bogs to fens, permafrost aggradation within fens, and permafrost thaw and reaggradation. Using data synthesis, we have identified predominant peatland successional pathways, changes in vegetation type, peat properties, and C accumulation rates associated with permafrost aggradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it