MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266634293

Planning for decommissioning of Ontario Power Generation's nuclear facilities

2006· article· en· W2266634293 on OpenAlexaffabout
N.D. Jayawardene

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Power Generation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear decommissioningNuclear powerBusinessEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceEngineeringWaste management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ontario Power Generation owns and operates nuclear generating stations at Pickering and Darlington and has leased Bruce generating stations A and B to Bruce Power (who will return them to OPG once the lease expires). OPG owns and operates interim radioactive waste management facilities on the Bruce site and used fuel storage facilities at Pickering and Bruce sites and plans are underway to design and build a similar facility on the Darlington site by 2007. OPG will decommission all these facilities when they are shutdown permanently. Planning for decommissioning at OPG started in the early 1980's when various options were conceived, subsequently developed and suitable strategies was formulated. OPG's plans for decommissioning the nuclear generating stations are to shutdown and store the stations in a safe storage mode for 30 years, followed by dismantling and site restoration. Plans for decommissioning of OPG's interim radioactive waste management facilities will involve: removal of the stored waste, re-packaging if required and transporting the waste to a long-term facility followed by dismantling the facilities and site restoration. The costs for decommissioning OPG's nuclear facilities are estimated based on the above plans, collected through electricity rates from customers and deposited in a decommissioning fund. This paper examines some of the decommissioning options considered, provides details of OPG's decommissioning strategy, gives cost estimates, and outlines OPG's achievements towards meeting its liabilities and fulfilling the regulatory requirements with respect to decommissioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207