'Infiniment Plus De Choses Dans La Vie Que Dans La Loi': La Reconnaissance Des Mères Lesbiennes ('Infinitely More Things in Life Than in the Law': Recognizing Lesbian Mothers)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: Ce texte rappelle qu’une reforme des regles relatives a la filiation visant a faire une place a deux parents de meme sexe ne pourrait simplement refleter les pratiques sociales; au contraire, elle les influencerait aussi de differentes manieres. En s’appuyant sur les recherches et les debats qui ont ete principalement publies en anglais, il compare les regimes mis en place au Royaume-Uni et au Quebec afin de reconnaitre la maternite des couples lesbiens des la naissance d’un enfant ne de la procreation assiste, sans passer par l’adoption. Ensuite, il compare les portraits de la maternite lesbienne qui s’en degage avec ceux qui nous sont fournis par la recherche empirique sociologique. Ces comparaisons donneront lieu a des reflexions quant aux problemes methodologiques que soulevent l’effort de rapprocher le droit et les pratiques sociales.English Abstract: This text is a reminder that law reform in order to recognize two parents of the same sex cannot simply reflect social practice, but will influence it in different ways. Based on research and debates published principally in English, the text compares the regimes enacted in the United Kingdom and in Quebec to grant parental status respecting the children born of assisted procreation to lesbian couples. Then it compares the portraits of lesbian motherhood implicit in those regimes with those provided by sociological empirical research. These comparisons inspire reflections on the methodological difficulties engendered by efforts to draw together law and social practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".