MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CFTR anion channel regulation by phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase at tyrosine 407 in osmosensing mitochondria‐rich ion transporting cells of killifish ( <i>Fundulus heteroclitus</i> )

2008· article· en· W2267065598 on OpenAlexaffabout
William S. Marshall, Fumi Katoh, Kaitlyn D. Watters, Megan T Goudie, Regina R. F. Cozzi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCalpain Protease Function and Regulation
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyFocal adhesionPhosphorylationTyrosine phosphorylationApical membraneBiologyChemistryBiochemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a tyrosine kinase with multiple Y sites and an ezrin/radixin/moesin binding site. Antibodies to the phosphorylated form of FAK at Y407 and Y587 are colocalized with the Cl − channel CFTR in the apical membrane of mitochondria‐rich (MR) cells of seawater‐acclimated euryhaline killifish opercular epithelium. Hypotonic treatment (80%, 224 mOsm/kg) causes rapid, reversible cell swelling (observed via confocal microscopy of living cells in situ ), inhibition of Cl − secretion and dephosphorylation of FAK pY407 but no effect on FAK phosphorylated at Y576. Re‐phosphorylation of FAK at Y407 specifically in the apical membrane of MR cells was immunohistochemically detected following 10‐min treatments with forskolin (10 μM), 3‐isobutyl‐1‐methylxanthine (IBMX, 0.1 mM) and isoproterenol (1.0 μM), all known to increase cAMP and activate CFTR. There is parallel recovery of Cl − secretion by MR cells in the isolated epithelium, detected electrophysiologically. These results suggest involvement of phosphorylation of FAK pY407 but not pY576 in cell signaling pathways regulating the Cl − transport function of CFTR. (Supported by NSERC Canada)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCalpain Protease Function and RegulationFrench-language works237,207