Ru alkylidene compounds bearing tridentate, dianionic ligands: Lewis acid activation and olefin metathesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The series of tridentate complexes of Ru-alkylidenes (L)Ru(CHPh)(SCH2CH2)2E (E = O, L = SIMes 1, PCy3 2, E = S, L = SIMes 3, PCy3 4; E = PPh 7, L = PCy3), (L)Ru(CHPh)(SC6H4)2S (L = SIMes 5, PCy3 6), (L)Ru(CHPh) (OCH2CH2)2O (L = SIMes 8, PCy3 9) were prepared and shown to react with one equivalent of BCl3 to give the complexes (L)Ru(CHPh)Cl[E(CH2CH2S)2BCl2] (E = O, L = SIMes 10, PCy3 11, E = S, L = SIMes 12a/b, PCy3 13, E = PPh, L = PCy3 16) and (L)Ru(CHPh)(SC6H4)2O (L = SIMes 14, PCy3 15). In the case of 1 and 2 reaction with two equivalents of BCl3 affording the corresponding cation via chloride abstraction. These cations coordinate MeCN to give the six coordinate Ru cation salts [(L)Ru(CHPh)- (NCMe)(O(CH2CH2S)2BCl2)][BCl4] L = SIMes 17, PCy3 18). The generated five coordinate cations derived from 2-9 via addition of two equivalents of BCl3 were evaluated in standard preliminary tests for olefin metathesis catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".