The Chinese triangle of Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong : comparative institutional analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The Orgins and Transformation of the Chinese Triangle by Alvin Y. So Economic Institutions From Regional Integration to Export Competition? The Evolution of the Chinese Economic Triangle by Xiangming Chen A Study of Confucian Entrepreneurs in Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong by Tak Sing Cheung and Ambrose Y.C. King Local Institutions and Property Rights Transformation: Regional Variations in Chinese Rural Reforms by Chih-Jou Jay Chen Job Stress in the Era of Market Reforms: Manufacturing Workers in Urban Shanghai by Gina Lai Gender Cultural Construction of Labor Politics: Gender, Kinship, and Ethnicity in Shenzhen Workplace by Ngai Pun Of Flesh and Blood: The Human Consequences of Economic Restructuring on Women Workers in Hong Kong by Chi-Kwan Ho Institutions and Networks Constructing Gender Inequality in Manufacturing Factories: The Case of Taiwan's Export Processing by Ray-May Hsung and Esther Ngan-Ling Chow Social Networks Guanxi: A Conceptual Analysis by Nan Lin Between Personal Ties and Organizational Imperative: The Formation of Exchange Networks among Hospitals by Ly-Yun Chang A Comparative Study of Personal Networks in Two Chinese Societies by Danching Ruan Overlapping Networks and Flexible Manufacturing: A Structural Analysis of Hong Kong-Based Garment Industry by Hon-Chu Leung The Chinese Disapora PRC Immigrants in the U.S.: A Demographic Profile and An Assessment of Their Integration in the Chinese-American Community by Fenggang Yang Immigrant Economy in a Pacific Rim Context: Chinese Business in Los Angeles by Yen-Fen Tseng and Yu Zhou Return Migration among Chinese Immigrants in Toronto by Kumiko Shibuya, Eric Fong, Ming-Long Lam, and Clement So Using Census Data to Conceptually Define the Chinese American Population by Dudley L. Poston. Jr., Runlong Huang, and Hong Dan Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".