Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canadian Review of Comparative Literature / Revue Canadienne de Litterature Comparee CRCL SEPTEMBER 2007 SEPTEMBRE RCLC 0319-051X/07/34.3/298©CANADIAN COMPARATIVE LITERATURE ASSOCIATION Aft er overcoming the rough transitional period at the beginning of the 1990s, a group of well-established Polish fi lmmakers, whose names are oft en synonymous with Polish national cinema, succeeded in winning back their audiences toward the end of the decade. Th eir commercial success came with fi lms that were always popular in Poland—lavish adaptations of the Polish national literary canon. Th anks to Jerzy Hoff man’s With Fire and Sword (Ogniem i mieczem) and Andrzej Wajda’s Pan Tadeusz, which together had more than thirteen million viewers in 1999, Polish cinema shared an unprecedented sixty percent of the local market. Th e success of Polish fi lms prompted the infl uential Rzeczpospolita fi lm critic, Barbara Hollender, to title her review article: “Hoff man and Wajda won over Hollywood” (Hollender 2000, 8). Another prominent critic, Zbigniew Pietrasik from the weekly Polityka, proclaimed in his 1999 article the long-awaited “true victory” of Polish cinema (Pietrasik 52). Th is essay looks at the recent Polish adaptations of the national literary canon and their successful competition with Hollywood cinema, which is partly achieved by nostalgic ventures into the distant past and the reliance on stereotypical attributes of Polishness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it