MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2267764638 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.tmp117

Abstract T MP117: Early Cognitive Dysfunction is Associated With Poor Short Term Functional Outcome in Hospitalized Stroke Patients

2014· article· en· W2267764638 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rahul R. Karamchandani, Farhaan Vahidy, Suhas Bajgur, Kim Yen Thi Vu, H. Alex Choi, Adeolu Funso Oladunjoye, Robert Hamilton, Sean I. Savitz

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Intracerebral hemorrhageInternal medicineLogistic regressionNeurocognitiveDementiaMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionMedical recordPediatricsPsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: More than one-half of all patients experience cognitive dysfunction (CD) after stroke, and up to one-third develop dementia. As a Comprehensive Stroke Center, we screen all stroke inpatients for CD, though the feasibility and utility of early screening have not been established. We assessed the hypotheses that early cognitive screening in hospitalized stroke patients is feasible and that early CD is associated with poor short term functional outcome. Methods: The medical records of all patients admitted with ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) between 2/1/13 and 4/15/13 were reviewed. A Brief Neurocognitive Screening Test assessing registration, delayed recall, fluency, and orientation was performed (4 items from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, higher score better; maximum 12 points). Patients were eligible if they did not have a medical condition precluding screening (e.g. death, comfort care). Results: Of 303 IS and ICH inpatients, 209 (68.98%) were screened for CD. Over 85% of all eligible patients were screened (87.1% IS and 81.1% ICH). In a multivariate logistic regression model, factors associated with being screened for CD included lower baseline NIHSS (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94) and IS subtype, as compared to ICH subtype (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.1-3.52). Median scores (IQR) for IS and ICH patients were 8 (3-10) and 5.5 (1.5-9.5), respectively. More than half of all IS and ICH patients (56.94%) screened positive for CD (score < 9). Patients most likely to screen positive for CD included those of older age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06) and increased NIHSS (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.19). Screening positive for CD was associated with poor discharge/day 7 outcome (mRS > 3), independent of age, baseline NIHSS, and stroke subtype (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.06-5.28). Conclusion: Screening hospitalized stroke patients for CD is feasible and CD in stroke inpatients is common. Older patients and those with more severe strokes are more likely to screen positive. Early CD is associated with poor short term functional outcome. Our results provide preliminary evidence supporting the use of early CD screening in stroke patients. Additional studies on quality of life and long-term outcome are necessary to further assess the utility of early CD screening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→