MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2267793212 · doi:10.54648/eerr2016001

Stronger Neighbourhood, Stronger Partnerships: A Revised European Neighbourhood Policy

2016· article· en· W2267793212 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Foreign Affairs Review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbourhood (mathematics)European Neighbourhood PolicyPolitical scienceEconomic geographyRegional sciencePublic administrationSociologyGeographyLawMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The European Commission adopted a strategic Communication on a revised European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in November 2015. This is the culmination of a process launched by President Juncker at the start of this Commission's mandate. The past twelve months have seen extensive work as we consulted partner countries and Member States -not just governments, but civil society, the private sector, local and regional government, social partners, International Financial Institutions (IFIs) and others.The adoption of the review is just the beginning of a process in which we will make our policy more effective and more relevant to the most urgent concerns of the EU and its partners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it