Transportation Economic Issues in the Proposed Annexation of Wendover, Utah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2002, the residents of Wendover, Utah voted in favor of annexation by the adjacent West Wendover, Nevada. While Wendover is blighted, West Wendover thrives in a gaming-based economy. The legislative process is lengthy because of the proposed realignment of the Nevada-Utah boundary. This paper examines the transportation-related implications of the proposed annexation. The capital value of Wendover’s transportation assets is about $40.6 million (U.S. $2003), although attention has been directed toward the Wendover Airport and an associated debt that had grown to $27 million by early 2006. Wendover’s annual tax revenue per km of road would increase from $22,800 to $43,300 following annexation. The additional funding would be useful in improving Wendover’s streets, 72% of which were either poor or unpaved in a June 2005 survey. There would be an immediate annual transportation cost increase of $725 per household in Wendover from higher licensing and registration fees, insurance premiums, and fuel taxes. City and county officials in Nevada were wrestling with being responsible for the airport’s debt, forcing officials in Utah to consider alternatives to annexation. One alternative would be to further develop the airport, and establish stronger linkages to nearby attractions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".