Thermoforming of Polylactic Acid Foam Sheets: Crystallization Behaviors and Thermal Stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biobased polylactic acid (PLA) foam packaging has been commercialized as an alternative to conventional polystyrene (PS) foam. However, PLA’s low glass transition temperature results in its inherently poor heat resistance and in turn limits the application to cold-fill packaging. In this study, low-density PLA foam sheet was extruded using an industry-scale tandem extrusion line and subsequently laminated with a PLA film casted from a high heat deflection temperature (HDT) PLA resin with a very low d -lactide monomer content (i.e., ∼0.4 mol %). Experimental results reveal that the crystallization behaviors of PLA foam sheets were sensitive to both thermoforming temperature and process-induced strain. Furthermore, this work has demonstrated that heat-resistant biodegradable PLA foam sheets could be realized by laminating them with solid films made of high-HDT PLA to serve as environmentally sustainable alternatives to PS foams in hot-fill packaging applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".