MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2268343697 · doi:10.5755/j01.eee.95.7.10051

Modelling the On-line Traffic Estimator in OPNET

2009· article· pl· W2268343697 on OpenAlex
Mihails Kuļikovs, E. Petersons

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElektronika ir Elektrotechnika · 2009
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEstimatorStatistical time division multiplexingDependency (UML)Resource allocationMultiplexingBandwidth (computing)Real-time computingContext (archaeology)Distributed computingComputer networkArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allocation techniques are needed to provide data services as efficiently as possible since resources are limited. To cope with this demand, the networks need dynamic and measurement-based resource allocation algorithms. For network links shared through statistical multiplexing, adaptive bandwidth allocation algorithms based on traffic measurements can achieve important gains. In this context, it is very important to choose measurement methods that satisfy stringent constraints in terms of both accuracy and complexity. The measurement time scales have critical effect of on the performance. We proposed an approach overcoming this dependency by adjusting the measurement time scale dynamically in accordance to traffic parameter. The paper covers issue with measured traffic store model with the following parameters estimation. Ill. 11, bibl. 5 (in English; summaries in English, Russian and Lithuanian).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it