Aide sociale au Nouveau-Brunswick: Le discours des personnes assistées sociales au sujets de leurs rapports avec leur gestionnaire de cas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This cuticle reports partial resuh.s of an action research on the topic of the perceiued relationship of indiuiduals receiuing social assistance to New Bnnuwick's income assisturce progran. More specifically, the article yresents the resuhs of an analysis of the discowse of socially assisted individwls conceming their dealings with social assistance fficers, cn caseworkers as they are called. Reqiec.ting these resuks sheds light on the ouerall relanonal dynamics between assistcLnce recipients md the social assistance s)srem, a'td more tetlingty on the gap between the oq.,ert plLrpose of the progratn, i.e. reaching self.sufficiency or exiting the s)stem, and its prupose as it is perceiarcd b1 recipients , i.e. keeping them within the system, as predicated by their notion of the role of caseworkers. The first utd second parts of the u'ticle present the backg'otmd aul aims of the research and its methodologl, while the third outlines its main findings . A+,entes for futtne research are suggested in concltuion, focusmg on the fruther study of relational dlnamics between fficiak responsible for inrplementing last resort progruns and socially assisred pelroru. R6sum6 Le prdsent article fait 6tat d'wte pa'tie des rdsultats d'tme recherche-action Dortant vtr les rapports qi'enffetiennent les personnes prestataires d'aide sociale auec le r6.g1me de s6.ctuit6 du reuenu du Nouueau-Brwtswick. S'insqiuart dans le champ d'€atde de I'application des polidques,l'article naite plus particulidrement des r1suhats obtenus quont d I'malyse du discotns des personnes assisties sociales au sujet de lerns rclpports aorcc les agents d'aide sociale appel6.s gestionnaires de cas (caseworkers) . Globalement., I'examen des rdsulmts met en Lwnidre la dynunique du rapport qu'entrenennent les personnes prestataires aaec Le sJstAme d'ade sociale et phts pcuticulidrement l'6cart entre ln fmalit6. ffich1.e du rdglme, soit l'atteinte de L'autosffisance ou ln sortie de l'aide sociale et la fmatitd telle que perqLrc par les persomtes prestataires, soit Le mainnen de celles'ci d l'intdriew- du rdgime en foncnon de lew conception du r6le du gestionnaire de cas. Les 1 eres et 2e parties de cet ardcle portent stu Le contixte et les objecnfs de la recherche et sw' Ia mdthodologle utilisde. La 3e [>arne porte qu011t d elle stn les ptincipaux rdsulnts obtenw. Des plstes de recherche futwes sont €onqudes en conclusion du doatment potu porter plus loin l' 6.tude de I'htfluence exerc,le par les agents d' aide sociale sur l' atteinte des objectifs uis6.s par b.s r1fom'tes des r€gtmes de sdcunte du reuenu au Canatla.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".