MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2268448293 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.168906

Intratumorally Injected <sup>177</sup>Lu-Labeled Gold Nanoparticles: Gold Nanoseed Brachytherapy with Application for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

2016· article· en· W2268448293 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodistributionNuclear medicineBreast cancerMedicineBrachytherapyCancerChemistryUrologyRadiation therapyInternal medicineIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Improvements in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) are needed. Our objective was to study a radiation nanomedicine (gold nanoseeds) composed of 30-nm gold nanoparticles (AuNP) modified with polyethyleneglycol (PEG) chains linked to DOTA for complexing the β-particle emitter (177)Lu and to panitumumab for targeting epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) ((177)Lu-T-AuNP) as a novel neoadjuvant brachytherapy for LABC. Nontargeted gold nanoseeds ((177)Lu-NT-AuNP) were constructed without panitumumab for comparison. METHODS: (177)Lu-T-AuNP or (177)Lu-NT-AuNP was injected intratumorally in CD-1 athymic mice bearing subcutaneous EGFR-positive MDA-MB-468 human breast cancer tumors. Biodistribution and small-animal SPECT/CT imaging studies were performed to evaluate tumor and normal organ localization. A short-term (15 d) study was conducted to select the most effective amount of (177)Lu-T-AuNP or (177)Lu-NT-AuNP for treatment with long-term observation (90-120 d). Normal organ toxicities were assessed by monitoring body weight, blood cell counts, and serum alanine aminotransferase and creatinine. Radiation-absorbed doses in the tumor and normal organs were estimated by Monte Carlo N-Particle version 5.0 modeling. RESULTS: Tumor radioactivity concentrations were high at 1 h after injection (>300-400 percentage injected dose per gram [%ID/g]) but decreased by 2-3-fold at 48 h after injection. Normal organ uptake was low (<0.5 %ID/g) except for the liver and spleen (<3 %ID/g), increasing by 2-5-fold at 48 h after injection. Treatment with 4.5 MBq (6 × 10(11) AuNP) of (177)Lu-T-AuNP or (177)Lu-NT-AuNP arrested tumor growth over 90 d without normal organ toxicity, whereas tumors continued to grow in mice treated with unlabeled T-AuNP or (177)Lu-labeled PEG polymer not linked to AuNP. Survival was prolonged up to 120 d in mice treated with (177)Lu-T-AuNP or (177)Lu-NT-AuNP. Radiation-absorbed doses to the tumor were 30 and 22 Gy for (177)Lu-T-AuNP and (177)Lu-NT-AuNP, respectively. Some tumor regions received high radiation doses (250-1,300 Gy). Normal organ doses were low (0.04-0.6 Gy). CONCLUSION: Gold nanoseeds injected intratumorally were highly effective for inhibiting the growth of breast cancer tumors in CD-1 athymic mice and caused no normal organ toxicity. These results are promising for their application for neoadjuvant brachytherapy of LABC. Because EGFR targeting was not required, the approach is broadly applicable to LABC with different phenotypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it