Bibliographic record
Abstract
Napalm: An American Biography, by Robert M. Neer. Cambridge, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2013. 352 pp. $29.95 US (cloth). During the Korean Prime Minister Winston Churchill reflected privately on the extensive use of US incendiary bombs across that East Asian peninsula. Demonstrating his knack for research, attorney and Columbia University history lecturer, Robert Neer recounts Churchill's quiet recollections: given its ill effects on civilians, I do not like this napalm bombing at all (p. 102). Over time, Churchill's caution proved prescient. Stitched throughout Neer's book is a poignant vignette from June 1972. With political thunderheads (p. 134) amassed in the United States, in part over the use of napalm in Southeast Asia, Associated Press photographer Nick Ut captured the grotesque horror associated with this indiscriminate weapon. His Pulitzer Prize-winning frame, The Terror of War, depicts nine-year-old Phan Thi Kim Phuc senselessly seared as she runs to escape fighting in Trang Bang, South Vietnam. Within a day, the worldwide press ran the ghastly photo; it went viral. Neer's work helps explain that, after years of smouldering in embers of ethical ambiguity, napalm flared in the court of worldwide public opinion (p. 222). As the horrific effects of napalm upon Vietnamese civilians, especially children, became understood, the brand turned bad. This auxology of napalm brims with riveting, if disquieting research, complemented by tightly focused chapters and snappy sentences. Simply, it is an engrossing, sobering work that consolidates knowledge while providing new research and fresh perspectives on the effects of this sickening incendiary gel that is sticky and bums to an extremely high temperature (p. 16). Substantively, the book has three inter-related strengths. First, Neer highlights the origins of napalm. While overlooking key concepts from arms race literature, he still explains concisely that liquid and gel incendiaries have an ancient provenance (p. 18). Even prior to the rise of Ancient Greece, fiery weapons terrorized sailors, soldiers and civilians. Indeed, Alexander the Great had an interest in the efficacy of naptha, or petroleum, as a weapon; later, while attacking the city of Samosata, advancing Roman soldiers were repelled by maltha or flaming mud. Beyond these anecdotes, the monograph explains why, beginning in mid-1200s and lasting for about eight hundred years, liquid incendiaries became less significant strategically: the rise of Chinese gunpowder. While engineers and others worked over centuries to rekindle interest in fire weapons, the paradigm held until World War I. Great War made it obvious that flamethrowers, modified shells and aerial firebombing were harbingers of lasting change. Indeed, aircraft restored incendiary weapons to their medieval pride of place (p. 24). And this combination of airpower and firebombing soon set alight communities in Africa, Europe, and Asia. While the world overlooked incendiary weapons in Ethiopia during the 1930s, the fuse igniting worldwide attention came from Guernica, Spain. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".