MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W22689330 · doi:10.1002/term.1515

腹腔鏡診断別にみた原因不明不妊における術後経過の検討(第79群 不妊・不育10)

2003· article· en· W22689330 on OpenAlexfundno aff
優 田中, 章 桑原, ゆかり 堤, 健二 檜尾, 利也 松崎, 正彦 前川, 敏之 安井, 修司 山野, 稔 苛原

Bibliographic record

Venue日本産科婦人科學會雜誌 · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs) have potential clinical utility in the treatment of a multitude of ailments and diseases, due to their relative ease of isolation from patients and their capacity to form many cell types. However, hBM-MSCs are sparse, and can only be isolated in very small quantities, thereby hindering the development of clinical therapies. The use of microcarrier-based stirred suspension bioreactors to expand stem cell populations offers an approach to overcome this problem. Starting with standard culture protocols commonly reported in the literature, we have successfully developed new protocols that allow for improved expansion of hBM-MSCs in stirred suspension bioreactors using CultiSpher-S microcarriers. Cell attachment was facilitated by using intermittent bioreactor agitation, removing fetal bovine serum, modifying the stirring speed and manipulating the medium pH. By manipulating these parameters, we enhanced the cell attachment efficiency in the first 8 h post-inoculation from 18% (standard protocol) to 72% (improved protocol). Following microcarrier attachment, agitation rate was found to impact cell growth kinetics, whereas feeding had no significant effect. By serially subculturing hBM-MSCs using the new suspension bioreactor protocols, we managed to obtain cell fold increases of 10³ within 30 days, which was superior to the 200-fold increase obtained using the standard protocol. The cells were found to retain their defining characteristics after several passages in suspension. This new bioprocess represents a more efficient approach for generating large numbers of hBM-MSCs in culture, which in turn should facilitate the development of new stem cell-based therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue日本産科婦人科學會雜誌Same topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207