Neuroprotective properties of the PrP-like Shadoo glycoprotein assessed in the middle cerebral artery occlusion model of ischemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biochemical similarities have been noted between the natively unstructured region of the cellular prion protein, PrP(C), and a GPI-linked glycoprotein called Shadoo (Sho); these proteins are encoded by the Prnp and Sprn genes, respectively. Both proteins are expressed in the adult central nervous system and they share overlapping partners, including each other, in interactome studies. As prior studies have ascribed neuroprotective properties to the N-terminal region of PrP(C), specifically the octarepeat region, we investigated Sho's neuroprotective properties. To this end we assessed Sho-null (Sprn(0/0)) and hemizygous (Sprn(0/+)) mice in the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model versus wild type mice and also vs. transgene-rescued Sprn(0/0)-TgSprn mice. Sprn(0/0) mice had a tendency to greater fragility in reaching endpoint and deficits in parameters including infarct volume and neurogenesis, with a reciprocal trend noted in transgene-rescued mice; however these effects did not reach significance. Loss of both PrP(C) and Sho immunostaining occurred in parallel to neuronal loss on the ipsilateral side of MCAO-lesioned animals; while focal elevations in immunostaining in the penumbra region were sometimes evident for PrP(C), they were not noted for Sho. Our studies argue against discernible neuroprotective action of Sho in the genetic backgrounds used for this MCAO paradigm. Whether or not the positively charged N-terminal regions in Sho and PrP(C) fulfil different roles in vivo remains to be determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".