MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Time from surgery to first adjuvant chemotherapy: Experiences at an inner-city Canadian hospital.

2013· article· en· W2269124464 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christina Marchand, Maha Hassan, Jalal Ebrahim, Ammar Bookwala, Laura Sevick, Ata Ansari, Audrey Wong, Sophie Hogeveen, Rosane Nisenbaum, Delilah Lisa Topic, Christine Brezden‐Masley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReferralColorectal cancerSurgeryChemotherapy regimenCancerPopulationChemotherapyRegimenInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

527 Background: Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) guidelines advise that colorectal cancer (CRC) patients receive their first adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) no later than 8 weeks after surgical resection, with new data suggesting optimal treatment to commence between 4 and 6 weeks. This retrospective study was performed to determine treatment timelines and identify barriers at St. Michael’s Hospital (SMH). Methods: Of the 507 patients diagnosed with CRC between Jan 1, 2005 and May 1, 2012 at SMH, 304 patients had stage II or III CRC. Our sample population of 159 patients received both surgical resection and AC at SMH. Data collected included: time between surgery and first AC, patient demographics, systemic/clinical barriers and recurrence-free survival. Data was analyzed using SAS statistical software assuming p-values <0.05 as significant. Results: Of our 159 patients, mean age was 61.3 years (range 28 – 91); 54% male and 70% had stage III disease; colon cancer (64%) and mean follow-up was 2.2 years (range 0.1 – 5.7). Mean time from surgery to first AC was 50.4 days (sd = 15.8) or 7.2 weeks ranging from 3 to almost 17 weeks. Medical complications affected 21.4% of patients. The presence of a complication was associated with delay in AC (9.5 days, p=0.001). Moreover, 11.1% of patients were excluded from sample, since complications exceeded treatment past 12 weeks, equating to no AC. Referral from surgeon averaged 21 days (sd=12.0), 10 days awaiting pathology. Medical Oncology consult to first AC averaged 19 days (sd=12.7), 12 days awaiting port-a-cath insertion. Each part of referral process was correlated with delay to AC. Only 18.9% of patients recurred. While trends were identified, association between delay and recurrence was weak (p=0.1457). Medical complication correlated strongly with recurrence (p=0.0472). Patients with complications had a higher rate of recurrence (32.4% vs 15.2%). Conclusions: Compliance to current CCO guidelines can be optimized in CRC patients at SMH. Barriers to timely treatment include patient age, timely referral and presence of a medical complication. Quality improvement rapid cycling of confounding barriers will be used prospectively to lower variance and achieve greater consistency in treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207