MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2269231033

Toxicology and pharmacokinetics of chimeric ARH460-16-2, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeting CD44

2007· article· en· W2269231033 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Hahn, Luis daCruz, Nadine Chouinard, Daniel S. Pereira, Daniel Rubinstein, David Young

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsArius3D (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclonal antibodyProstateCancerBiologyAntibodyCD44MedicineColorectal cancerPathologyCancer researchImmunologyInternal medicineIn vitro
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B41 CD44 is a widely distributed cancer-associated membrane glycoprotein, believed to play a critical role in cellular adhesion, migration, invasion and tumorigenicity. CD44 was recently shown to be expressed in cancer stem cells from several cancer types, including breast, colon, prostate, pancreas and AML. A monoclonal antibody targeting CD44, ARH460-16-2, was identified using the Arius’ FunctionFirst™ platform. The chimeric version of the antibody demonstrated potent dose-dependent tumor growth inhibition in an in vivo established subcutaneous model of breast cancer and in an established orthotopic model of metastatic liver cancer at all doses tested (20, 2 and 0.2 mg/kg). IHC staining of human cancers from breast, prostate, colon, and liver demonstrated that the epitope for ARH460-16-2 is present on the majority of human adenocarcinomas. Limited binding to normal human tissues was observed, predominantly in the bone marrow myeloid series with no binding to erythroid cells, megakaryocytes, endothelium, fibroblasts, smooth muscle, eye, heart, liver, ovary and colon epithelium. The binding pattern was not substantially different in cynomolgus monkey tissues, although some differences in intensity were seen. To enable the clinical development of ARH460-16-2, a dose-finding toxicology study was carried out in cynomolgus monkeys using the chimeric version of the antibody. In the first phase, monkeys (2 per group) were given a single 1 hr infusion of 10, 30 or 95 (high dose) mg/kg chARH460-16-2. A second cohort of 3 monkeys was infused with 25 mg/kg chARH460-16-2 once per week for 2 doses. Animals were observed daily, and clinical chemistry, hematology and coagulation parameters were assessed 24 hr after injection, and then twice more after 9 and 28 days for the first cohort. For the second cohort, analysis was similar except that the final blood collection was carried out at Day 15, at which point the repeat-dose animals were sacrificed for necropsy. In one of the high-dose treated monkeys, and all subjects in the repeat-dose group, there was a transient reddening of the skin which resolved after a few days. There were small decreases in the indicators of circulating erythrocyte mass which were attributable to blood sampling for clinical pathology and toxicokinetic assessments. These changes were accompanied by expected and appropriately increased reticulocyte counts. Other fluctuations in hematology, coagulation, body weight and clinical chemistry parameters were sporadic, transient, observed prestudy, and/or of a magnitude of change that is commonly observed in laboratory-housed cynomolgus monkeys undergoing similar study procedures. Together with the potent anti-tumor effect in models of human cancer, these results support the clinical development of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeting the cancer stem cell antigen CD44.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207