Approximate Analytical-Pressure Studies on Dual-Porosity Reservoirs With Stress-Sensitive Permeability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Pressure-transient analysis in dual-porosity media is commonly studied by assuming a constant reservoir permeability. Such an assumption can result in significant errors when estimating pressure behavior and production rate of naturally fractured reservoirs as fracture permeability decreases during the production. At present, there is still a lack of analytical pressure-transient studies in naturally fractured reservoirs while taking stress-sensitive fracture permeability into account. In this study, an approximate analytical model is proposed to investigate the pressure behavior and production rate in the naturally fractured reservoirs. This model assumes that fracture permeability is a function of both permeability modulus and pressure difference. The pressure-dependent fracture system is coupled with matrix system with an unsteady-state exchange flow rate. A nonlinear diffusivity equation in fracture system is developed and solved by Pedrosa's transformation and a perturbation technique with zero-order approximation. A total of six solutions in the Laplace space are presented for two inner-boundary conditions and three outer-boundary conditions. Finally, pressure behavior and production rate are studied for both infinite and finite reservoirs. Pressure behavior and production rate from the models with and without stress-sensitive permeability are compared. It is found that, for an infinite reservoir with a constant-flow-rate boundary condition, if permeability modulus is 0.1, dimensionless pressure difference at the well bottom from the model with fracture-permeability sensitivity is 80% higher than that of the constant fracture-permeability model at a dimensionless time of 106. Such difference can be as high as 216% if permeability modulus increases to 0.15. On the contrary, for the infinite reservoirs with a constant-pressure boundary, the constant fracture-permeability model tends to overestimate the flow rate at wellbore and cumulative production. The proposed model not only provides an analytical and quantitative method to investigate the effects of fracture-permeability sensitivity on reservoir-pressure distribution and production, but it also can be applied to build up analysis of well test data from stress-sensitive formations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".