MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2269923245

Abstract 15302: Genetic Enhancement of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in Human Cardiac Stem Cells Prevents Cell Death and Enhances Ischemic Myocardial Repair

2013· article· en· W2269923245 on OpenAlexaff
Robyn Jackson, Everad L. Tilokee, Nicholas Latham, Bin Ye, Munir Boodhwani, Vincent Chan, Marc Ruel, Erik J. Suuronen, Duncan J. Stewart, Darryl R. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParacrine signallingStem cellPopulationGrowth factorMyocardial infarctionStem cell factorAndrologyCancer researchInternal medicineEndocrinologyCell biologyBiologyReceptorProgenitor cell
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) activates pro-survival pathways and improves post ischemic cardiac function but this key cytokine is not expressed by ex vivo proliferated human cardiac stem cells (CSCs). Here, we explore the influence of an IGF-1 enhanced paracrine signature on CSC-mediated cardiac repair. Methods/Results: To rationalize the timing of IGF-1 delivery to infarcted myocardium, the expression of the IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) transcript was screened in myocardial samples from C57 mice taken 1, 7, 14 and 21 days after experimental myocardial infarction (MI). Seven days after LAD ligation, IGF-1R expression was increased by 1.4±0.7 and 3.0±0.8 fold in the infarct and border zones (p≤0.05) and remained elevated throughout the sampling period. Based on these data, human CSCs underwent lentivirus-mediated somatic gene transfer to overexpress human IGF-1 (CSC IGF-1 ) or the GFP reporter alone (CSC GFP ). Genetic engineering enhanced the IGF-1 content within hypoxic conditioned media by 8.1±1.9 fold (p=0.01) with no discernible effects on population doubling time (1.1±0.3 vs. 1.2±0.1 days, p=ns). With the exception of enhanced IGF-1, a proteomic array of 59 cardioprotective/pro-angiogenic cytokines demonstrated that CSC IGF-1 engineering improved the secretion of additional cytokines compared to CSC GFP . Culture of CSC IGF-1 within conditions designed to mimic the ischemic border zone improved proliferation and reduced the expression of annexin V compared to CSC GFP or non-transduced CSCs (proliferation: 30±13% vs. -14±15% or -19±12% change in cell numbers, p≤0.05; annexin V: 30±6% vs. 74±9% or 77±1%, respectively; p≤0.05). These results may be partially explained through the enhancement of downstream activators within the AKT, ERK and MAPK pro-survival pathways (p≤0.05 vs. CSC GFP ). Intra-myocardial injection of CSC IGF-1 into immunodeficient mice one week after MI enhanced cardiac repair as compared to CSC GFP and vehicle controls. (echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction 28 days post LAD ligation: 41±1% vs. 37±1% or 25±1%, respectively; p Conclusions: Paracrine engineering of CSCs to over-express IGF-1 boosts CSC resistance to hypoxia and improves cell-mediated cardiac repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207