MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2270092577

Maintenant, un indexical pur et dur ?

2009· preprint· fr· W2270092577 on OpenAlexaff
Marcel Vuillaume

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2009
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Linguistic Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EnglishThe aim of this contribution is to explain the ability of the French adverb to refer to moment of the past in texts like encyclopaedias or historical works. To solve the problem raised by examples like (1): (1) 1691, Fontenelle etait elu membre de l'Academie francaise et, en 1697, il etait recu l'Academie des sciences, dont il fut secretaire perpetuel partir de 1699. Cependant la deuxieme edition de l'Histoire des oracles suscita un orage contre l'auteur. Les temps avaient change depuis la premiere edition. Maintenant regnait le pere La Chaise, confesseur du roi. Intransigeant et fanatique, il voulait etouffer les Lumieres en atteignant le seul representant qui fut accessible. (Encyclopaedia Universalis) some authors use the concept of point of view and argue that is not true indexical, but rather is to be understood as perspectival (Recanati). In my contribution, I propose more parsimonious solution, showing that is true indexical, that its relevant reading in (1) is metonymical and can be paraphrased by a l'epoque dont il est question maintenant (=the period that we are now dealing with). francaisMaintenant / now est souvent presente comme le prototype meme des indexicaux purs (au sens de Kaplan). Cependant, il connait des emplois qui invitent remettre cette idee en cause. Il peut en effet designer, dans des contextes non-fictionnels, un point du temps qui ne coincide pas avec le moment de son emploi : En 1697, [Fontenelle] etait recu l'Academie des sciences, dont il fut secretaire perpetuel partir de 1699. Cependant la deuxieme edition de l'Histoire des oracles suscita un orage contre l'auteur. Les temps avaient change depuis la premiere edition. Maintenant regnait le pere La Chaise, confesseur du roi. (Encyclopaedia Universalis) Pour en rendre compte, on proposera une solution, compatible avec la conception de / now comme indexical pur et fondee sur la notion de metonymie : l'idee est que, dans (1), le point du temps vise par est identifie indirectement par reference au moment de son evocation dans le discours, comme l'illustre la paraphrase : A l'epoque dont il est question regnait le pere La Chaise� .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207