MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2270358971

Canada-United States Supply Chain in the Era of Global Economic Competitiveness

2010· article· en· W2270358971 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Kelly Tompkins, Garland Chow, Paul Vandevert

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada-United States law journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainBusinessChain (unit)International tradeEconomic geographyEconomicsMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

States Speaker -Paul Vandevert 8 assembly of one car can involve three, four, five border crossings.Producing each part in the most efficient location improves productivity, lowers costs, increases profits and that is the essence of today's global supply chain manager's challenge.9 Inefficiency, whether it is due to a lagging 3 Imports, exports and trade balance of goods on a balance-of-payments basis, by country or country grouping, Statistics Canada, available at http://www40.statcan.ca/101/cst01/gblec02a.htm (last visited Oct. 9, 2008); See also, Ontario Exports/Imports by Country, Ont.Econ.Dev., available at http://www.2ontario.com/welcome/ooit_317.asp(last visited Oct. 9, 2008).4 See generally Stephanie Fitch & Joann Muller, The Troll Under The Bridge, Forbes, at 134 (Nov.15, 2004).5 See Imports, exports and trade balance of goods on a balance-of-payments basis, by country or country grouping, supra note 3.6 See generally Samuel Palmisano, The Globally Integrated Enterprise, 85 Foreign Affairs 127, 127-136 (2006).7 See generally William Hoffman, Global supply chain?What global supply chain?;People talk about them, but BDP study says they're still relatively rare, J. Com.,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0130.006
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada-United States law journalSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207