MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A NEW CHANNID (TELEOSTEI: CHANNIFORMES) FROM THE EOCENE AND OLIGOCENE OF EGYPT

2006· article· de· W2270362123 on OpenAlexaff
Alison M. Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Paleontology · 2006
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnakeheadPaleontologyGenusTeleosteiFossil RecordGeologyOld WorldBiologyEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>Fishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Upper Eocene and lower Oligocene deposits of the Jebel Qatrani Formation, Fayum Depression, Egypt, have provided a number of skulls and other bones that belong to a species of snakehead (Channidae). This material is morphologically more similar to species of Parachanna, rather than species of Channa, and is here described as a new species, Parachanna fayumensis. It differs from the other species of the genus in possessing a prominent tooth patch on the posterior end of the parasphenoid.This new species of channid is the oldest member of the family known from Africa. Prior to this record, the oldest African fossil channid material was found in Mio–Pliocene deposits. This lack of information on the African fossil record leads to biogeographic reconstructions in which channids were believed to have arisen in Asia and invaded Africa through fresh waters, only after the two continents were connected in the Miocene. The Egyptian material shows that channids were in the fresh waters of Africa in the latest Eocene. Either a freshwater connection existed between Africa and Asia before or during the late Eocene, or members of the Channidae were able to migrate through marine waters to attain their current distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PaleontologySame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207