MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P316: Very Low Prevalence of Ideal Cardiovascular Health in Young Adults Studying at the Universite de Sherbrooke

2012· article· en· W2270709418 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie‐France Hivert, Myriam Doyon, Geneviève Forget, Guillaume Lacerte, Mélissa Labonté, Christine Brown, Marie‐France Langlois

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiovascular healthBlood pressureGuidelineCohortBody mass indexHealth promotionSittingGerontologyInternal medicineDiseasePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In 2010, the American Heart Association (AHA) published a special report to define and set national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction (2020 Strategic Impact Goals). Ideal cardiovascular health was defined based on seven metrics including both ideal health behaviors (nonsmoking, body mass index < 25 kg/m2, physical activity at goal levels, and pursuit of a diet consistent with current guideline recommendations) and ideal health factors (untreated total cholesterol < 200 mg/dL [5.2 mmol/L], untreated blood pressure < 120/ < 80 mm Hg, and fasting blood glucose 8h of overnight fasting, using standardized procedures. Resting blood pressure was measured in the sitting position (twice, using the average for analyses). Physical activity was assessed by a validated questionnaire. Dietary intake was assessed by 3-day food diary; the average per day or the estimations per week were used accordingly to the specific dietary component recommendation. Results: The cohort was composed of young adults (20.6 ± 2.9 years old), mainly of European origin (97.8%), and 74.6% were female. Overall, only one participant (0.4%) achieved ideal cardiovascular health (all seven ideal health metrics). Very few participants (2.2%) achieved ideal healthy diet score (4-5 components /5). Investigating individual dietary component, our results showed that 9.4% consumed ≥ 4.5 cups/day of fruits and vegetables, 25.7% had ≥ two servings/week of fish, 14.5% reported ≥ three servings/day of fiber-rich whole grains, 8.0% consumed < 1500g/day of sodium, and 75.4% reported drinking < 36oz / week of sugar-sweetened beverages. Concerning the other health metrics, 22.8% achieved the recommended level of physical activity, 93.8% were non-smokers, 75.7% had a BMI < 25kg/m2, 42.4% had a blood pressure in the ideal range ( < 120/ < 80 mmHg), 99.6% had a normal fasting glucose ( < 5.6 mmol/L), and 42.4% had a total cholesterol < 5.2 mmol/L. Conclusions: The prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health is very low, even in a population of young adults interested in healthy lifestyle. The low prevalence is mainly dependent on the healthy dietary score where the biggest challenges seem to be consumption of fruits and vegetables, and limiting sodium intake. Public health actions are seriously needed to improve these health metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207