A phase II study of Halichondrin B analog eribulin mesylate (E7389) as second-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e15634 Background: Eribulin mesylate is a halichondrin B analog that inhibits microtubule dynamics by a mechanism that is distinct from other tubulin-targeted agents. Preclinical studies suggest that Eribulin may be effective in pancreatic cancer. The primary objective of this study was to determine the objective response rate (complete and partial) to Eribulin in patients with advanced, pancreatic adenocarcinoma that had progressed after gemcitabine based therapy. Methods: Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma; measurable locally advanced, or metastatic disease; disease progression after gemcitabine; and ECOG performance status 0–2. Patients (pts) received Eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed by CT scans every 6 weeks while on treatment. Initially 12 pts were to be accrued, if 1 or more pt(s) had an objective response the accrual would increase to a total of 37. Results: 15 pts were accrued,14 received treatment and 12 were evaluable for response. Median age 61; M:F = 8:7; ECOG 1:2 = 11:4; Median number of cycles 2 (1–15). Grade 3+ adverse events included neutropenia (29%), fatigue (14%), peripheral neuropathy (7%) and thrombosis (7%). There were no complete or partial responses, and therefore the study was closed at the first accrual cut off. The best response was stable disease (SD) in 5/12 (42%) pts. Of these 5 pts, 3 (42%) had SD for 12 cycles or greater. Survival data is pending. Conclusions: Eribulin was well tolerated and did not result in any objective responses in refractory pancreatic cancer. However, 42% of pts had stable disease and for 3 pts this was maintained for more than 9 months. Further studies of eribulin in pancreatic cancer may be warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Non-randomized trial | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Randomized trial | medium |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".