MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271362113 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-02/7/539

Enhancing the Stability of Non-Aqueous Electrolytes for Li-O<sub>2</sub> Batteries

2014· article· en· W2271362113 on OpenAlexaff
Brian D. Adams, Robert W. Black, Zack Williams, Russel Fernandes, Marine Cuisinier, Erik J. Berg, Petr Novák, Graham K. Murphy, Linda F. Nazar

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteChemistryDimethoxyethaneInorganic chemistryLithium (medication)Aqueous solutionElectrochemistryOxalateElectrodeOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Li-O2 cells have been the subject of intense investigation in the last few years. The first step in the discharge reaction (oxygen reduction reaction or ORR) is thought to be a 1 e- process that forms the highly reactive intermediate superoxide, O2 -/LiO2. This superoxide species is responsible for the decomposition of most common non-aqueous electrolyte solvents.1 Finding a stable electrolyte for the non-aqueous Li-O2battery is a significant challenge. While allowing conduction of lithium ions between the electrodes, the electrolyte must be stable to nucleophilic attack on discharge, to oxidative decomposition on charge, and inert to the negative electrode. No such solution has been reported to date, and the understanding of the properties that confer stability is lacking. We will present a novel synthesized electrolyte, a chelate ionic liquid (IL), which is stable with respect to metallic lithium and also to superoxide-initiated attack. Figure 1a displays the 1H-NMR spectra of the by-products on cathodes discharged in the chelate IL as well as in the reference standard electrolyte, 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME). Lithium formate (δ = 8.46 ppm) and dimethyl oxalate (δ = 3.92 ppm) are the two main proton-containing decomposition products formed from the DME molecule. These products are not observed for the new electrolyte. Moreover, when employed in a Li-O2 battery, 8-fold less CO2 evolution occurs on charge than for DME. CO2 is known to evolve during charge of the battery due to the oxidation of lithium carbonates/carboxylates which are formed as side-products by decomposition of electrolytes on discharge.2 This is shown by the results of differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) in Figure 1b. Many other cell components besides the electrolyte suffer from instabilities in the non-aqueous Li-O2 battery, including binders and cathode materials.3,4 In particular, alternatives to carbon-based cathodes must be developed. By switching the positive electrode support to non-carbonaceous materials, cells utilizing the new chelate IL electrolyte have been cycled for over 300 hours with no capacity fading and little increase in polarization.5 In comparison, cells with the DME electrolyte, had a cycle life of less than 130 hours. This is displayed in Figure 2a and a comparison of the voltage profiles on the 10th cycle is shown in Figure 2b. The current causes of electrolyte instabilities will be discussed as well as pathways toward the development of new electrolyte/electrode systems with enhanced stabilities. References S. A. Freunberger, Y. Chen, N. E. Drewett, L. J. Hardwick, F. Bardé, P. G. Bruce, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1-6. B. D. McCloskey, A. Speidel, R. Scheffler, D. C. Miller, V. Viswanathan, J. S. Hummelshoj, J. K. Norskov, A. C. Luntz, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 997-1001. R. Black, S. H. Oh, J.-H. Lee, T. Yim, B. Adams, L. F. Nazar, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2902-2905. M. M. O. Thotiyl, S. A. Freunberger, Z. Peng, Y. Chen, Z. Liu, P. G. Bruce, Nature Mat. 2013 , 12, 1050-1056. B.D. Adams, R. Black, Z. Williams, R. Fernandes, M. Cuisinier, E. Jaemstorp Berg, P. Novak, G.K. Murphy, L.F. Nazar, Submitted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207